| |
|
|
|
Thank you for the 50,000.
|
|
|
| |
|
I also appreciate your courage and perseverance in the face of generically reported bureaucratic obstacles. I would not have contacted you if it were not reported that you were held in esteem within your organization, an organization I have studied for years. I did expect some communication plan in your response. I viewed the postal delivery as a necessary risk and do not wish to trust again that channel with valuable material. I did this only because I had to so you would take my offer seriously, that there be no misunderstanding as to my long-term value, and to obtain appropriate security for our relationship from the start.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“B” then rejected the contact plans proposed by the KGB, and suggested a particular communications scheme based on “a microcomputer ‘bulletin board’” at a designated location, with “appropriate encryption.” Meanwhile, he wrote: “Let us use the same site again. Same timing. Same signals.” “B” proposed that the next dead drop occur on “September 9" which, according to the “6" coefficient that he established with the KGB in his first letter, actually meant that the dead drop operation would take place on March 3, 1986.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
“B” also wrote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As far as the funds are concerned, I have little need or utility for more than the 100,000. It merely provides a difficulty since I can not spend it, store it or invest it easily without triping [sic] “drug money” warning bells. Perhaps some diamonds as security to my children and some good will so that when the time comes, you will accept by [sic] senior services as a guest lecturer. Eventually, I would appreciate an escape plan. (Nothing lasts forever.)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
